↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Oral intake of a combination of glucosyl hesperidin and caffeine elicits an antiobesity effect in healthy, moderately obese subjects: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Oral intake of a combination of glucosyl hesperidin and caffeine elicits an antiobesity effect in healthy, moderately obese subjects: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Published in
Nutrition Journal, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0253-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuya Ohara, Koutarou Muroyama, Yoshihiro Yamamoto, Shinji Murosaki

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,212,567
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#720
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,248
of 310,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.