↓ Skip to main content

Design and Synthesis of Tricyclic JAK3 Inhibitors with Picomolar Affinities as Novel Molecular Probes

Overview of attention for article published in ChemMedChem, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and Synthesis of Tricyclic JAK3 Inhibitors with Picomolar Affinities as Novel Molecular Probes
Published in
ChemMedChem, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/cmdc.201300520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Gehringer, Ellen Pfaffenrot, Silke Bauer, Stefan A. Laufer

Abstract

The Janus kinase (JAK) signaling pathway is of particular importance in the pathology of inflammatory diseases and oncological disorders, and the inhibition of Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) with small molecules has proven to provide therapeutic immunosuppression. A novel class of tricyclic JAK inhibitors derived from the 3-methyl-1,6-dihydrodipyrrolo[2,3-b:2',3'-d]pyridine scaffold was designed based on the tofacitinib-JAK3 crystal structure by applying a rigidization approach. A convenient synthetic strategy to access the scaffold via an intramolecular Heck reaction was developed, and a small library of inhibitors was prepared and characterized using in vitro biochemical as well as cellular assays. IC50 values as low as 220 pM could be achieved with selectivity for JAK3 over other JAK family members. Both activity and selectivity were confirmed in a cellular STAT phosphorylation assay, providing also first-time data for tofacitinib. Our novel inhibitors may serve as tool compounds and useful probes to explore the role of JAK3 inhibition in pharmacodynamics studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,037,966
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from ChemMedChem
#2,114
of 3,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,927
of 316,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemMedChem
#28
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.