You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems as a Rhinoceros Anti-Poaching Tool in Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0083873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margarita Mulero-Pázmány, Roel Stolper, L. D. van Essen, Juan J. Negro, Tyrell Sassen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 29% |
| Denmark | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 22% |
| Researcher | 53 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 85 | 23% |
| Engineering | 26 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 71 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#887,774
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,580
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,252
of 324,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#332
of 5,419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.