You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large-Scale Spatial Distribution Patterns of Echinoderms in Nearshore Rocky Habitats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013845 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrin Iken, Brenda Konar, Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi, Juan José Cruz-Motta, Ann Knowlton, Gerhard Pohle, Angela Mead, Patricia Miloslavich, Melisa Wong, Thomas Trott, Nova Mieszkowska, Rafael Riosmena-Rodriguez, Laura Airoldi, Edward Kimani, Yoshihisa Shirayama, Simonetta Fraschetti, Manuel Ortiz-Touzet, Angelica Silva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,931
of 195,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,252
of 100,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#552
of 994 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 994 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.