You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Universal Health Insurance Coverage on Hypertension Management: A Cross-National Study in the United States and England
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0083705 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew R. H. Dalton, Eszter P. Vamos, Matthew J. Harris, Gopalakrishnan Netuveli, Robert M. Wachter, Azeem Majeed, Christopher Millett |
Abstract |
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) galvanised debate in the United States (US) over universal health coverage. Comparison with countries providing universal coverage may illustrate whether the ACA can improve health outcomes and reduce disparities. We aimed to compare quality and disparities in hypertension management by socio-economic position in the US and England, the latter of which has universal health care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 45% |
Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#770,694
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,356
of 214,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,234
of 317,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#303
of 5,353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.