You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Indicated Versus Routine Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-013-0077-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haitham W. Tuffaha, Claire M. Rickard, Joan Webster, Nicole Marsh, Louisa Gordon, Marianne Wallis, Paul A. Scuffham |
| Abstract |
Millions of peripheral intravenous catheters are used worldwide. The current guidelines recommend routine catheter replacement every 72-96 h. This practice requires increasing healthcare resource use. The clinically indicated catheter replacement strategy is proposed as an alternative. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 43% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,867,780
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#245
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,443
of 304,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.