Title |
Reducing bias in RNA sequencing data: a novel approach to compute counts
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-s1-s7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesca Finotello, Enrico Lavezzo, Luca Bianco, Luisa Barzon, Paolo Mazzon, Paolo Fontana, Stefano Toppo, Barbara Di Camillo |
Abstract |
In the last decade, Next-Generation Sequencing technologies have been extensively applied to quantitative transcriptomics, making RNA sequencing a valuable alternative to microarrays for measuring and comparing gene transcription levels. Although several methods have been proposed to provide an unbiased estimate of transcript abundances through data normalization, all of them are based on an initial count of the total number of reads mapping on each transcript. This procedure, in principle robust to random noise, is actually error-prone if reads are not uniformly distributed along sequences, as happens indeed due to sequencing errors and ambiguity in read mapping. Here we propose a new approach, called maxcounts, to quantify the expression assigned to an exon as the maximum of its per-base counts, and we assess its performance in comparison with the standard approach described above, which considers the total number of reads aligned to an exon. The two measures are compared using multiple data sets and considering several evaluation criteria: independence from gene-specific covariates, such as exon length and GC-content, accuracy and precision in the quantification of true concentrations and robustness of measurements to variations of alignments quality. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 58% |
France | 1 | 8% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
China | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 67% |
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 132 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 26% |
Researcher | 39 | 26% |
Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 51% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 19% |
Computer Science | 10 | 7% |
Engineering | 6 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 14% |