↓ Skip to main content

Improvements in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Diastolic Function Following Renal Denervation Effects Beyond Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Reduction

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improvements in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Diastolic Function Following Renal Denervation Effects Beyond Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Reduction
Published in
JACC, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan H. Schirmer, Marwa M.Y.A. Sayed, Jan-Christian Reil, Christian Ukena, Dominik Linz, Michael Kindermann, Ulrich Laufs, Felix Mahfoud, Michael Böhm

Abstract

This study sought to investigate the interaction between blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) reduction and changes in left ventricular (LV) structure and function following renal sympathetic denervation (RDN).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 67%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2014.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#13,552
of 16,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,832
of 320,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#108
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.