↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Lymphadenectomy in Melanoma Patients: Clarifying the Effects of Timing of Surgery and Lymph Node Tumor Burden

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Lymphadenectomy in Melanoma Patients: Clarifying the Effects of Timing of Surgery and Lymph Node Tumor Burden
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2013
DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3253-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Spillane, Sandro Pasquali, Lauren E. Haydu, John F. Thompson

Abstract

Melanoma patients with lymph node (LN) metastases have variable survival after lymphadenectomy. This study investigates whether lymphadenectomy at different times in the course of disease progression influences disease-free survival (DFS; time from primary diagnosis to first recurrence after lymphadenectomy), post recurrence survival (PRS; time from first recurrence after lymphadenectomy to death), and overall survival (OS; time from diagnosis to death).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Master 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,696,692
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,483
of 6,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,410
of 203,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#10
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.