You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne Sniekers, Sven Stringer, Kyoko Watanabe, Philip R Jansen, Jonathan R I Coleman, Eva Krapohl, Erdogan Taskesen, Anke R Hammerschlag, Aysu Okbay, Delilah Zabaneh, Najaf Amin, Gerome Breen, David Cesarini, Christopher F Chabris, William G Iacono, M Arfan Ikram, Magnus Johannesson, Philipp Koellinger, James J Lee, Patrik K E Magnusson, Matt McGue, Mike B Miller, William E R Ollier, Antony Payton, Neil Pendleton, Robert Plomin, Cornelius A Rietveld, Henning Tiemeier, Cornelia M van Duijn, Danielle Posthuma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,801 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 365 | 20% |
| United States | 117 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 53 | 3% |
| France | 19 | 1% |
| Germany | 19 | 1% |
| Spain | 17 | <1% |
| Australia | 16 | <1% |
| Canada | 13 | <1% |
| Mexico | 9 | <1% |
| Other | 118 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1055 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1606 | 89% |
| Scientists | 153 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 729 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 715 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 147 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 124 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 10% |
| Other | 44 | 6% |
| Other | 128 | 18% |
| Unknown | 124 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 126 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 16% |
| Psychology | 85 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 65 | 9% |
| Other | 116 | 16% |
| Unknown | 157 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2022. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,659
of 25,944,331 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#6
of 7,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54
of 331,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#1
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,944,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.