↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypes of Atopic Dermatitis Depending on the Timing of Onset and Progression in Childhood

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Pediatrics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
49 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypes of Atopic Dermatitis Depending on the Timing of Onset and Progression in Childhood
Published in
JAMA Pediatrics, July 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Roduit, Remo Frei, Martin Depner, Anne M. Karvonen, Harald Renz, Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer, Elisabeth Schmausser-Hechfellner, Juha Pekkanen, Josef Riedler, Jean-Charles Dalphin, Erika von Mutius, Roger Pascal Lauener, Anne Hyvärinen, Pirkka Kirjavainen, Sami Remes, Marjut Roponen, Marie-Laure Dalphin, Vincent Kaulek, Markus Ege, Jon Genuneit, Sabina Illi, Micahel Kabesch, Bianca Schaub, Petra Ina Pfefferle, Gert Doekes

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis is an inflammatory, pruritic skin disease that often occurs in early infancy with a chronic course. However, a specific description of subtypes of atopic dermatitis depending on the timing of onset and progression of the disease in childhood is lacking. To identify different phenotypes of atopic dermatitis using a definition based on symptoms before age 6 years and to determine whether some subtypes are more at risk for developing other allergic diseases. The Protection Against Allergy Study in Rural Environments (PASTURE) is a European birth cohort where pregnant women were recruited between August 2002 and March 2005 and divided in 2 groups dependent on whether they lived on a farm. Children from this cohort with data on atopic dermatitis from birth to 6 years of age were included. Atopic dermatitis, defined as an itchy rash on typical locations from birth to 6 years. The latent class analysis was used to identify subtypes of atopic dermatitis in childhood based on the course of symptoms. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to analyze the association between atopic dermatitis phenotypes and other allergic diseases. We included 1038 children; of these, 506 were girls. The latent class analysis model with the best fit to PASTURE data separated 4 phenotypes of atopic dermatitis in childhood: 2 early phenotypes with onset before age 2 years (early transient [n = 96; 9.2%] and early persistent [n = 67; 6.5%]), the late phenotype with onset at age 2 years or older (n = 50; 4.8%), and the never/infrequent phenotype (n = 825; 79.5%), defined as children with no atopic dermatitis. Children with both parents with history of allergies were 5 times more at risk to develop atopic dermatitis with an early-persistent phenotype compared with children with parents with no history of allergies. Both early phenotypes were strongly associated with food allergy. The risk of developing asthma was significantly increased among the early-persistent phenotype (adjusted odds ratio, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.31-6.31). The late phenotype was only positively associated with allergic rhinitis. Using latent class analysis, 4 phenotypes of atopic dermatitis were identified depending on the onset and course of the disease. The prevalence of asthma and food allergy by 6 years of age was strongly increased among children with early phenotypes (within age 2 years), especially with persistent symptoms. These findings are important for the development of strategies in allergy prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 17 9%
Student > Master 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 56 28%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 37%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Unspecified 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 69 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#805,186
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#1,467
of 6,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,459
of 330,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#32
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.