↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular and Mixotrophic Symbiosis in the Whale-Fall Mussel Adipicola pacifica: A Trend in Evolution from Extra- to Intracellular Symbiosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular and Mixotrophic Symbiosis in the Whale-Fall Mussel Adipicola pacifica: A Trend in Evolution from Extra- to Intracellular Symbiosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Masaru Kawato, Chikayo Noda, Gin Kinoshita, Toshiro Yamanaka, Yuko Fujita, Katsuyuki Uematsu, Jun-Ichi Miyazaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 76 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 42%
Environmental Science 12 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,646,478
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#160,969
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,962
of 106,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#651
of 778 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 778 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.