The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Top predators constrain mesopredator distributions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms15469 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Newsome, Aaron C. Greenville, Duško Ćirović, Christopher R. Dickman, Chris N. Johnson, Miha Krofel, Mike Letnic, William J. Ripple, Euan G. Ritchie, Stoyan Stoyanov, Aaron J. Wirsing |
| Abstract |
Top predators can suppress mesopredators by killing them, competing for resources and instilling fear, but it is unclear how suppression of mesopredators varies with the distribution and abundance of top predators at large spatial scales and among different ecological contexts. We suggest that suppression of mesopredators will be strongest where top predators occur at high densities over large areas. These conditions are more likely to occur in the core than on the margins of top predator ranges. We propose the Enemy Constraint Hypothesis, which predicts weakened top-down effects on mesopredators towards the edge of top predators' ranges. Using bounty data from North America, Europe and Australia we show that the effects of top predators on mesopredators increase from the margin towards the core of their ranges, as predicted. Continuing global contraction of top predator ranges could promote further release of mesopredator populations, altering ecosystem structure and contributing to biodiversity loss. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 13% |
| United States | 10 | 8% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 78 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 65% |
| Scientists | 38 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 406 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 78 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 18% |
| Researcher | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 172 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 88 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 111 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 266. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#143,389
of 26,308,718 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,079
of 60,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,917
of 331,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#44
of 1,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,308,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.