↓ Skip to main content

Unroofed coronary sinus in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unroofed coronary sinus in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0103-05822013000400019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano Pereira Bender, Maria Rita F. Meyer, Rafael Fabiano M. Rosa, Rosana Cardoso M. Rosa, Patrícia Trevisan, Paulo Ricardo G. Zen

Abstract

To report the uncommon association between neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and unroofed coronary sinus.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,360,179
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#210
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,160
of 307,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them