You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic comparison of sporeforming bacilli isolated from milk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea I Moreno Switt, Alexis D Andrus, Matthew L Ranieri, Renato H Orsi, Reid Ivy, Henk C den Bakker, Nicole H Martin, Martin Wiedmann, Kathryn J Boor |
| Abstract |
Sporeformers in the order Bacillales are important contributors to spoilage of pasteurized milk. While only a few Bacillus and Viridibacillus strains can grow in milk at 6°C, the majority of Paenibacillus isolated from pasteurized fluid milk can grow under these conditions. To gain a better understanding of genomic features of these important spoilage organisms and to identify candidate genomic features that may facilitate cold growth in milk, we performed a comparative genomic analysis of selected dairy associated sporeformers representing isolates that can and cannot grow in milk at 6°C. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 83% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,013,303
of 23,985,711 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,060
of 10,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,874
of 314,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#105
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,985,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,871 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.