You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ABO Genotype, ‘Blood-Type’ Diet and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0084749 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingzhou Wang, Bibiana García-Bailo, Daiva E. Nielsen, Ahmed El-Sohemy |
| Abstract |
The 'Blood-Type' diet advises individuals to eat according to their ABO blood group to improve their health and decrease risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease. However, the association between blood type-based dietary patterns and health outcomes has not been examined. The objective of this study was to determine the association between 'blood-type' diets and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health and whether an individual's ABO genotype modifies any associations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 404 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 58 | 14% |
| Thailand | 25 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 6% |
| Australia | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| Spain | 10 | 2% |
| Chile | 9 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 8 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 182 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 320 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 49 | 12% |
| Scientists | 27 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 14% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 20% |
| Unknown | 60 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 838. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,267
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#360
of 225,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150
of 339,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#12
of 5,548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.