↓ Skip to main content

Hospitalization risk of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic cases in Hong Kong

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hospitalization risk of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic cases in Hong Kong
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi-Ling Wang, Chit-Ming Wong, Kwok-Hung Chan, King-Pan Chan, Pei-Hua Cao, JS Malik Peiris, Lin Yang

Abstract

Reliable assessment for the severity of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza is critical for evaluation of vaccination strategies for future pandemics. This study aims to estimate the age-specific hospitalization risks of the 2009 pandemic cases during the first wave in Hong Kong, by combining the findings from the serology and disease burden studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 3%
Taiwan 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,616,159
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,302
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,893
of 310,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#94
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.