You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The ANTOP study: focal psychodynamic psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy, and treatment-as-usual in outpatients with anorexia nervosa - a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-10-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beate Wild, Hans-Christoph Friederich, Gaby Gross, Martin Teufel, Wolfgang Herzog, Katrin E Giel, Martina de Zwaan, Henning Schauenburg, Carmen Schade-Brittinger, Helmut Schäfer, Stephan Zipfel |
| Abstract |
Anorexia nervosa is a serious eating disorder leading to high morbidity and mortality as a result of both malnutrition and suicide. The seriousness of the disorder requires extensive knowledge of effective treatment options. However, evidence for treatment efficacy in this area is remarkably weak. A recent Cochrane review states that there is an urgent need for large, well-designed treatment studies for patients with anorexia nervosa. The aim of this particular multi-centre study is to evaluate the efficacy of two standardized outpatient treatments for patients with anorexia nervosa: focal psychodynamic (FPT) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Each therapeutic approach is compared to a "treatment-as-usual" control group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 78 | 49% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,830,741
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#45
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,016
of 108,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them