↓ Skip to main content

Fast Reconstruction of Compact Context-Specific Metabolic Network Models

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fast Reconstruction of Compact Context-Specific Metabolic Network Models
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikos Vlassis, Maria Pires Pacheco, Thomas Sauter

Abstract

Systemic approaches to the study of a biological cell or tissue rely increasingly on the use of context-specific metabolic network models. The reconstruction of such a model from high-throughput data can routinely involve large numbers of tests under different conditions and extensive parameter tuning, which calls for fast algorithms. We present fastcore, a generic algorithm for reconstructing context-specific metabolic network models from global genome-wide metabolic network models such as Recon X. fastcore takes as input a core set of reactions that are known to be active in the context of interest (e.g., cell or tissue), and it searches for a flux consistent subnetwork of the global network that contains all reactions from the core set and a minimal set of additional reactions. Our key observation is that a minimal consistent reconstruction can be defined via a set of sparse modes of the global network, and fastcore iteratively computes such a set via a series of linear programs. Experiments on liver data demonstrate speedups of several orders of magnitude, and significantly more compact reconstructions, over a rival method. Given its simplicity and its excellent performance, fastcore can form the backbone of many future metabolic network reconstruction algorithms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Luxembourg 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 340 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 28%
Student > Master 59 16%
Researcher 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 60 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 22%
Computer Science 36 10%
Engineering 30 8%
Chemical Engineering 14 4%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 70 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,352,214
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,524
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,858
of 322,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#46
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.