You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A National Survey of Musculoskeletal Impairment in Rwanda: Prevalence, Causes and Service Implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002851 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oluwarantimi Atijosan, Dorothea Rischewski, Victoria Simms, Hannah Kuper, Bonaventure Linganwa, Assuman Nuhi, Allen Foster, Chris Lavy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 27% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,937
of 195,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,294
of 82,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#291
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.