You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Generation of Human Antigen-Specific Monoclonal IgM Antibodies Using Vaccinated “Human Immune System” Mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013137 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo D. Becker, Nicolas Legrand, Caroline M. M. van Geelen, Miriam Noerder, Nicholas D. Huntington, Annick Lim, Etsuko Yasuda, Sean A. Diehl, Ferenc A. Scheeren, Michael Ott, Kees Weijer, Heiner Wedemeyer, James P. Di Santo, Tim Beaumont, Carlos A. Guzman, Hergen Spits |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 46% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,393,730
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,448
of 195,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,590
of 99,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#161
of 905 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 905 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.