↓ Skip to main content

Hypertrophy Dependent Doubling of L-Cells in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Operated Rats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypertrophy Dependent Doubling of L-Cells in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Operated Rats
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl Frederik Hansen, Marco Bueter, Nadine Theis, Thomas Lutz, Sarah Paulsen, Louise S. Dalbøge, Niels Vrang, Jacob Jelsing

Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) leads to a rapid remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the underlying mode of action remains incompletely understood. L-cell derived gut hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) are thought to play a central role in the anti-diabetic effects of RYGB; therefore, an improved understanding of intestinal endocrine L-cell adaptability is considered pivotal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,438,522
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,442
of 194,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,840
of 197,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,946
of 4,613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.