↓ Skip to main content

Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
38 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
602 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002006.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janesh K Gupta, Akanksha Sood, G Justus Hofmeyr, Joshua P Vogel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 602 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 600 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 95 16%
Student > Master 72 12%
Researcher 45 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 7%
Student > Postgraduate 27 4%
Other 91 15%
Unknown 230 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 142 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 128 21%
Social Sciences 31 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 <1%
Computer Science 6 <1%
Other 38 6%
Unknown 251 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#189,366
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#327
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,914
of 327,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.