You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioturbation as a key driver behind the dominance of Bacteria over Archaea in near-surface sediment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-02295-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xihan Chen, Thorbjørn Joest Andersen, Yuki Morono, Fumio Inagaki, Bo Barker Jørgensen, Mark Alexander Lever |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,308,455
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#34,397
of 142,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,676
of 329,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#956
of 3,801 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,801 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.