↓ Skip to main content

Fire, landscape heterogeneity and wildlife management in Australia’s tropical savannas: introduction and overview

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fire, landscape heterogeneity and wildlife management in Australia’s tropical savannas: introduction and overview
Published in
Wildlife Research, August 2005
DOI 10.1071/wr05069
Authors

Peter J. Whitehead, Jeremy Russell-Smith, John C. Z. Woinarski

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 29%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 40%
Environmental Science 13 27%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#576
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,562
of 68,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.