The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Group problem-solving skills training for self-harm: randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101816 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carmel McAuliffe, Breda C. McLeavey, Tony Fitzgerald, Paul Corcoran, Bernie Carroll, Louise Ryan, Brian O'Keeffe, Eva Fitzgerald, Portia Hickey, Mary O'Regan, Jillian Mulqueen, Ella Arensman |
| Abstract |
Rates of self-harm are high and have recently increased. This trend and the repetitive nature of self-harm pose a significant challenge to mental health services. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,236,737
of 25,984,873 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,300
of 6,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,709
of 453,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#944
of 5,323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,984,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.