↓ Skip to main content

Group problem-solving skills training for self-harm: randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group problem-solving skills training for self-harm: randomised controlled trial
Published in
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmel McAuliffe, Breda C. McLeavey, Tony Fitzgerald, Paul Corcoran, Bernie Carroll, Louise Ryan, Brian O'Keeffe, Eva Fitzgerald, Portia Hickey, Mary O'Regan, Jillian Mulqueen, Ella Arensman

Abstract

Rates of self-harm are high and have recently increased. This trend and the repetitive nature of self-harm pose a significant challenge to mental health services.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,744,035
of 17,692,737 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,274
of 5,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,760
of 262,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#25
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,692,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.