↓ Skip to main content

Group problem-solving skills training for self-harm: randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group problem-solving skills training for self-harm: randomised controlled trial
Published in
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.101816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmel McAuliffe, Breda C. McLeavey, Tony Fitzgerald, Paul Corcoran, Bernie Carroll, Louise Ryan, Brian O'Keeffe, Eva Fitzgerald, Portia Hickey, Mary O'Regan, Jillian Mulqueen, Ella Arensman

Abstract

Rates of self-harm are high and have recently increased. This trend and the repetitive nature of self-harm pose a significant challenge to mental health services.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 24 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,743,861
of 20,131,764 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,204
of 5,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,195
of 277,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#22
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,131,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.