You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of lead poisoning of wild raptors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.762 |
| Authors |
Jesse A. Fallon, Patrick Redig, Tricia A. Miller, Michael Lanzone, Todd Katzner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 19% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 34% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,588,126
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#108
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,703
of 324,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.