↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of lead poisoning of wild raptors

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Society Bulletin, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of lead poisoning of wild raptors
Published in
Wildlife Society Bulletin, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/wsb.762
Authors

Jesse A. Fallon, Patrick Redig, Tricia A. Miller, Michael Lanzone, Todd Katzner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 9 11%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 16%
Environmental Science 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 17 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,966,010
of 20,494,250 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#70
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,030
of 285,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,494,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.