You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia in euthymic bipolar disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mette Kvisten Steinan, Karoline Krane-Gartiser, Knut Langsrud, Trond Sand, Håvard Kallestad, Gunnar Morken |
| Abstract |
Patients with bipolar disorder experience sleep disturbance, even in euthymic phases. Changes in sleep pattern are frequent signs of a new episode of (hypo)mania or depression. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is an effective treatment for primary insomnia, but there are no published results on the effects of CBT-I in patients with bipolar disorder. In this randomized controlled trial, we wish to compare CBT-I and treatment as usual with treatment as usual alone to determine its effect in improving quality of sleep, stabilizing minor mood variations and preventing new mood episodes in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and comorbid insomnia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,857,504
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#45
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,945
of 322,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#22
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.