↓ Skip to main content

Review of phenol treatment in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of phenol treatment in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10151-009-0519-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cuneyt Kayaalp, Cemalettin Aydin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 11 28%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#703
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,538
of 111,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.