↓ Skip to main content

Comparability of tympanic and oral mercury thermometers at high ambient temperatures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparability of tympanic and oral mercury thermometers at high ambient temperatures
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy L Chue, Rachael L Moore, Andrew Cavey, Elizabeth A Ashley, Kasia Stepniewska, François Nosten, Rose McGready

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Engineering 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,249
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,075
of 164,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#31
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.