You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the performance of nanostructured materials as lithium-ion battery electrodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nano Research, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12274-013-0375-x |
| Authors |
Mark J. Armstrong, Colm O’Dwyer, William J. Macklin, Justin. D. Holmes |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 433 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 29% |
| Researcher | 85 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 114 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 85 | 19% |
| Engineering | 78 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 66 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Unknown | 58 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,590,084
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#315
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,475
of 309,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.