↓ Skip to main content

Re-evaluating self-evaluation. A commentary on Jen, Jones, and Johnston (68:4, 2009)

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Re-evaluating self-evaluation. A commentary on Jen, Jones, and Johnston (68:4, 2009)
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, February 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Barford, Danny Dorling, Kate Pickett

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,264,165
of 12,266,780 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#1,558
of 7,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,941
of 221,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#36
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,266,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.