You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perceptions of adult trauma patients on the acceptability of text messaging as an aid to reduce harmful drinking behaviours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bridget Kool, Emily Smith, Kimiora Raerino, Shanthi Ameratunga |
| Abstract |
Brief interventions (BIs) have been shown to be effective in modifying hazardous drinking behaviours in a range of settings. However, they are underutilised in hospitals due to resource constraints. We explored the perspectives of admitted trauma patients about the appeal, acceptability and content of a Brief Intervention (BI) delivered via text messages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,985
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,942
of 4,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,519
of 317,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#64
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.