↓ Skip to main content

Individual patient data systematic review and meta-analysis of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonography for detecting raised intracranial pressure: protocol of the ONSD research group

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual patient data systematic review and meta-analysis of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasonography for detecting raised intracranial pressure: protocol of the ONSD research group
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-62
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Dubourg, Mahmoud Messerer, Dimitrios Karakitsos, Venkatakrishna Rajajee, Erik Antonsen, Etienne Javouhey, Alessandro Cammarata, Michael Cotton, Roy Thomas Daniel, Carmelo Denaro, Emmanuel Douzinas, Clément Dubost, Moncef Berhouma, Behrouz Kassai, Muriel Rabilloud, Antonino Gullo, Abderrhammane Hamlat, Gregorios Kouraklis, Giuseppe Mannanici, Keith Marill, Sybille Merceron, John Poularas, Giuseppe Ristagno, Vicki Noble, Sachita Shah, Heidi Kimberly, Gianluca Cammarata, Riccardo Moretti, Thomas Geeraerts

Abstract

The purpose of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) research group project is to establish an individual patient-level database from high quality studies of ONSD ultrasonography for the detection of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), and to perform a systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA), which will provide a cutoff value to help physicians making decisions and encourage further research. Previous meta-analyses were able to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD ultrasonography in detecting raised ICP but failed to determine a precise cutoff value. Thus, the ONSD research group was founded to synthesize data from several recent studies on the subject and to provide evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of ONSD ultrasonography in detecting raised ICP.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Benin 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Rwanda 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 72 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 15%
Researcher 12 15%
Other 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 56%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,893,322
of 12,440,396 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#512
of 1,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,781
of 227,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.