You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Multi-Clade Test Supports the Intermediate Dispersal Model of Biogeography
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0086780 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ingi Agnarsson, Ren-Chung Cheng, Matjaž Kuntner |
Abstract |
Biogeography models typically focus on explaining patterns through island properties, such as size, complexity, age, and isolation. Such models explain variation in the richness of island biotas. Properties of the organisms themselves, such as their size, age, and dispersal abilities, in turn may explain which organisms come to occupy, and diversify across island archipelagos. Here, we restate and test the intermediate dispersal model (IDM) predicting peak diversity in clades of relatively intermediate dispersers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 24% |
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 65% |
Environmental Science | 11 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,286,150
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#117,433
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,784
of 308,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,080
of 5,595 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,595 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.