Title |
Endosymbiont or host: who drove mitochondrial and plastid evolution?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biology Direct, February 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6150-6-12 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeferson Gross, Debashish Bhattacharya |
Abstract |
The recognition that mitochondria and plastids are derived from alphaproteobacterial and cyanobacterial endosymbionts, respectively, was one of the greatest advances in modern evolutionary biology. Researchers have yet however to provide detailed cell biological descriptions of how these once free-living prokaryotes were transformed into intracellular organelles. A key area of study in this realm is elucidating the evolution of the molecular machines that control organelle protein topogenesis. Alcock et al. (Science 2010, 327 [5966]:649-650) suggest that evolutionary innovations that established the mitochondrial protein sorting system were driven by the alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont (an "insiders' perspective"). In contrast, here we argue that evolution of mitochondrial and plastid topogenesis may better be understood as an outcome of selective pressures acting on host cell chromosomes (the "outsiders' view"). |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 91 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Professor | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 63% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 19% |