↓ Skip to main content

Endosymbiont or host: who drove mitochondrial and plastid evolution?

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endosymbiont or host: who drove mitochondrial and plastid evolution?
Published in
Biology Direct, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-6-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeferson Gross, Debashish Bhattacharya

Abstract

The recognition that mitochondria and plastids are derived from alphaproteobacterial and cyanobacterial endosymbionts, respectively, was one of the greatest advances in modern evolutionary biology. Researchers have yet however to provide detailed cell biological descriptions of how these once free-living prokaryotes were transformed into intracellular organelles. A key area of study in this realm is elucidating the evolution of the molecular machines that control organelle protein topogenesis. Alcock et al. (Science 2010, 327 [5966]:649-650) suggest that evolutionary innovations that established the mitochondrial protein sorting system were driven by the alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont (an "insiders' perspective"). In contrast, here we argue that evolution of mitochondrial and plastid topogenesis may better be understood as an outcome of selective pressures acting on host cell chromosomes (the "outsiders' view").

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 91 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 19%