Title |
Making the case for directed organ donation to registered donors in Israel
|
---|---|
Published in |
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-4015-3-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gil Siegal |
Abstract |
The number of deceased donor organ donations in Israel is lower than average when compared to other Western World countries. To address the organ gap, the 2008 Organ Transplantation Law provides new interventions, including important incentives to donors (and their families). The most notable of these was granting priority to registered donors (i.e., people on the waiting list who signed a donor card). The current study presents the normative arguments as well as the first documentation of public attitudes in Israel towards another possible incentive - allowing individuals to influence the allocation of their organs by permitting them to designate, to direct their donated organs [DD] to other registered donors, instead of the current allocation based primarily on medical criteria. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Romania | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 26% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Philosophy | 3 | 9% |
Psychology | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |