↓ Skip to main content

Aging of Non-Visual Spectral Sensitivity to Light in Humans: Compensatory Mechanisms?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aging of Non-Visual Spectral Sensitivity to Light in Humans: Compensatory Mechanisms?
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0085837
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raymond P. Najjar, Christophe Chiquet, Petteri Teikari, Pierre-Loïc Cornut, Bruno Claustrat, Philippe Denis, Howard M. Cooper, Claude Gronfier

Abstract

The deterioration of sleep in the older population is a prevalent feature that contributes to a decrease in quality of life. Inappropriate entrainment of the circadian clock by light is considered to contribute to the alteration of sleep structure and circadian rhythms in the elderly. The present study investigates the effects of aging on non-visual spectral sensitivity to light and tests the hypothesis that circadian disturbances are related to a decreased light transmittance. In a within-subject design, eight aged and five young subjects were exposed at night to 60 minute monochromatic light stimulations at 9 different wavelengths (420-620 nm). Individual sensitivity spectra were derived from measures of melatonin suppression. Lens density was assessed using a validated psychophysical technique. Although lens transmittance was decreased for short wavelength light in the older participants, melatonin suppression was not reduced. Peak of non-visual sensitivity was, however, shifted to longer wavelengths in the aged participants (494 nm) compared to young (484 nm). Our results indicate that increased lens filtering does not necessarily lead to a decreased non-visual sensitivity to light. The lack of age-related decrease in non-visual sensitivity to light may involve as yet undefined adaptive mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Psychology 9 9%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#891,801
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,743
of 217,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,774
of 319,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#350
of 5,575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.