↓ Skip to main content

地方会・研究会記録

Overview of attention for article published in Sangyō igaku Japanese journal of industrial health, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
地方会・研究会記録
Published in
Sangyō igaku Japanese journal of industrial health, March 2009
DOI 10.1539/joh1959.35.167

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,811,399
of 11,468,579 outputs
Outputs from Sangyō igaku Japanese journal of industrial health
#52
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,714
of 267,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sangyō igaku Japanese journal of industrial health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,468,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them