You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
LiNa Wu, Tjeerd Germans, Ahmet Güçlü, Martijn W Heymans, Cornelis P Allaart, Albert C van Rossum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 138 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 19% |
Researcher | 19 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 11% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
Other | 33 | 23% |
Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 59% |
Engineering | 12 | 8% |
Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 6% |
Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2014.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,293
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,785
of 323,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.