You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional carbon nitride materials — design strategies for electrochemical devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Materials, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.30 |
| Authors |
Fabian K. Kessler, Yun Zheng, Dana Schwarz, Christoph Merschjann, Wolfgang Schnick, Xinchen Wang, Michael J. Bojdys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Czechia | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 63% |
| Scientists | 12 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 486 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 124 | 25% |
| Researcher | 63 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 143 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 158 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 67 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 33 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Unknown | 166 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,629,246
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Materials
#185
of 831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,895
of 331,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Materials
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.