You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gender differences in the utilization of health care services.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Family Practice, February 2000
|
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K D Bertakis, R Azari, L J Helms, E J Callahan, J A Robbins |
Abstract |
Studies have shown that women use more health care services than men. We used important independent variables, such as patient sociodemographics and health status, to investigate gender differences in the use and costs of these services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 537 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 98 | 18% |
Researcher | 73 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 54 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 6% |
Other | 103 | 19% |
Unknown | 113 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 158 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 68 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 8% |
Psychology | 28 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 24 | 4% |
Other | 70 | 13% |
Unknown | 153 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#562,022
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family Practice
#13
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#490
of 112,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family Practice
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them