↓ Skip to main content

Randomized clinical study on the analgesic effect of local infiltration versus spinal block for hemorrhoidectomy.

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized clinical study on the analgesic effect of local infiltration versus spinal block for hemorrhoidectomy.
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0001260117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Borges, Luis Antônio, da Cunha Leal, Plínio, Rey Moura, Ed Carlos, Sakata, Rioko Kimiko

Abstract

Postoperative analgesia and early recovery are important for hospital discharge. The primary objective of this study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness of perianal infiltration and subarachnoid anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. The secondary objective was to compare time to discharge, adverse effects and complications. Randomized, prospective and comparative study at Dr. Mário Gatti Hospital. Forty patients aged 18-60, in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status category 1 or 2, were included. The local group (LG) received local infiltration (0.75% ropivacaine) under general anesthesia; the spinal group (SG) received subarachnoid block (2 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine). Analgesic supplementation consisted of fentanyl for LG and lidocaine for SG. Postoperative pain intensity, sphincter relaxation, lower-limb strength, time to discharge, analgesic dose over one week and adverse effects were assessed. Eleven LG patients (52.4%) required supplementation, but no SG patients. Pain intensity was higher for LG up to 120 min, but there were no differences at 150 or 180 min. There were no differences in the need for paracetamol or tramadol. Times to first analgesic supplementation and hospital discharge were longer for SG. The adverse effects were nausea, dizziness and urinary retention. Pain intensity was higher in LG than in SG over the first 2 h, but without differences after 150 and 180 min. Time to first supplementation was shorter in LG. There were no differences in doses of paracetamol and tramadol, or in adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02839538.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%