You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-017-00030-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven L. Brunton, Bingni W. Brunton, Joshua L. Proctor, Eurika Kaiser, J. Nathan Kutz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 27% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 3% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 77% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 505 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 499 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 135 | 27% |
| Researcher | 73 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 108 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 162 | 32% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 46 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 40 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 75 | 15% |
| Unknown | 129 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,805,529
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#24,574
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,857
of 333,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#538
of 1,075 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,075 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.