↓ Skip to main content

Immune System Dysfunction in the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 217)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune System Dysfunction in the Elderly
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, March 2017
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201720160487
Pubmed ID
Authors

EDUARDO FUENTES, MANUEL FUENTES, MARCELO ALARCÓN, IVÁN PALOMO

Abstract

Human aging is characterized by both physical and physiological frailty that profoundly affects the immune system. In this context aging is associated with declines in adaptive and innate immunity established as immunosenescence. Immunosenescence is a new concept that reflects the age-associated restructuring changes of innate and adaptive immune functions. Thus elderly individuals usually present chronic low-level inflammation, higher infection rates and chronic diseases. A study of alterations in the immune system during aging could provide a potentially useful biomarker for the evaluation of immune senescence treatment. The immune system is the result of the interplay between innate and adaptive immunity, yet the impact of aging on this function is unclear. In this article the function of the immune system during aging is explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 420 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 17%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 6%
Researcher 24 6%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 164 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 31 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 182 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,975,082
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
#11
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,761
of 327,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them