The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Teaching Clinical Ethics at the Bedside: William Osler and the Essential Role of the Hospitalist
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.peer2-1706 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew William McCarthy, Joseph J Fins |
Abstract |
As the field of hospital medicine celebrates its twenty-first anniversary, we believe it is time to expand its mission to play an even greater role in medical education. Given hospitalists' proximity to students and clinical material, members of this growing cohort of physicians are uniquely positioned to teach normative reasoning, professionalism, communication, and medical ethics in real time to trainees on the wards. But, to do so, we must reimagine the role of the hospitalist in graduate and postgraduate medical education. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Kuwait | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 52% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 26% |
Scientists | 7 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,111,004
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#630
of 2,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,200
of 335,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#22
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.