You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative: lessons from the medicines transparency alliance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-017-0106-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Taryn Vian, Jillian C. Kohler, Gilles Forte, Deirdre Dimancesco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,032,869
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#87
of 517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,586
of 331,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.