↓ Skip to main content

Dexmedetomidine for the management of awake fibreoptic intubation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dexmedetomidine for the management of awake fibreoptic intubation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009798.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xing-Ying He, Jian-Ping Cao, Qian He, Xue-Yin Shi

Abstract

Awake fibreoptic intubation (AFOI) frequently requires sedation, anxiolysis and relief of discomfort without impairing ventilation and depressing cardiovascular function. The goal is to allow the patient to be responsive and co-operative. Medications such as fentanyl, remifentanil, midazolam and propofol have been reported to assist AFOI; however,these agents are associated with cardiovascular or respiratory adverse effects. Dexmedetomidine has been proposed as an alternative to facilitate AFOI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 28 28%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 59%
Psychology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 21 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,692,624
of 14,257,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,473
of 10,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,644
of 248,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,257,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.