↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001897.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M N Duffy, Neil Johnson, Gaity Ahmad, Andrew Watson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 113%
Unspecified 7 88%
Student > Master 6 75%
Student > Postgraduate 5 63%
Other 5 63%
Other 17 213%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 325%
Unspecified 10 125%
Psychology 4 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Other 5 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,562,064
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,700
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,614
of 273,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.