↓ Skip to main content

Decisional Procrastination in Academic Settings: The Role of Metacognitions and Learning Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decisional Procrastination in Academic Settings: The Role of Metacognitions and Learning Strategies
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00973
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria de Palo, Lucia Monacis, Silvana Miceli, Maria Sinatra, Santo Di Nuovo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Lecturer 8 6%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 54 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 30%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 56 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,361,468
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,529
of 34,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,438
of 318,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#252
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.